interactions:angular_pair_potentials
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| interactions:angular_pair_potentials [2018/01/06 10:39] – ↷ Page moved from angular_pair_potentials to interactions:angular_pair_potentials daniel | interactions:angular_pair_potentials [2018/01/06 11:04] (current) – daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | The way the angular pair potentials are implemented is similar as how it was done for the MEAM potential. | + | The angular pair potentials are a combination of the regular pair potentials and a angular dependent term similar to MEAM: |
| - | The Pair+Angles component is precisely | + | |
| $$ | $$ | ||
| Line 10: | Line 9: | ||
| $$ | $$ | ||
| - | Coulomb interactions are computed the same as in all the others electrostatic models. | + | With this approach it is possible to fit potentials such as this one [[http:// |
| - | With this approach we can consider immediately potentials such as the one used [here](http:// | + | Or it can be used to consider non-bonded angular interactions as DL_POLY does for the three-body terms (see ' |
| - | + | ||
| - | Or we can use it to consider non-bonded angular interactions as DL_POLY does for the three-body terms (see ' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In addition only for these interactions, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I added a couple of new functions also, an harmonic (despite parabola can contain this, I think is useful to have the classic formula), a Born-Mayer function, and an _acos(r)_ harmonic. The latter, by applying | + | |
| ===== Number of potential functions ===== | ===== Number of potential functions ===== | ||
interactions/angular_pair_potentials.1515231549.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/01/06 10:39 by daniel
