interactions:tbeam
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
tbeam [2014/01/23 10:10] – remove warning daniel | interactions:tbeam [2018/01/22 17:47] (current) – daniel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The two band EAM potentials are an extension to the regular EAM potentials. Instead | The two band EAM potentials are an extension to the regular EAM potentials. Instead | ||
of single transfer and embedding functions, different functions to model two bands are used. | of single transfer and embedding functions, different functions to model two bands are used. | ||
+ | Usually they are reffered to as d- and s-band contributions. | ||
$$E_\text{total}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i< | $$E_\text{total}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i< | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
$\rho^s_0, \ldots, \rho^s_N, | $\rho^s_0, \ldots, \rho^s_N, | ||
$F^s_0, \ldots, F^s_N,$ | $F^s_0, \ldots, F^s_N,$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Special remarks | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tabulated two band EAM potentials require the embedding function $F_i$ to be defined at a density of $1.0$. | ||
+ | This is necessary to fix the gauge degrees of freedom. |
interactions/tbeam.1390468213.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/01/23 10:10 by daniel